| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| Brevard |
1. Student Mid-Term Survey
Sections of survey:
- Demographic information
- Instruction strategies
- Effectiveness of strategies
- Intervention opportunities to help maximize success
- Effectiveness of strategies
- Effectiveness of average response times (24-72 hours)
(3 pages) |
Communication among faculty & students |
- Strategies used: Virtual classroom or chat sessions scheduled, class conference calls
- Have you been contacted by the instructor or someone else concerning academic jeopardy due to inadequate participation in this online course?
|
| Prompt Feedback |
Strategies: Interactive quizzes with (24-72 hours) |
| Collaboration among students |
Strategies: Required to work with other students on collaborative assignments and/or projects |
| Technical Support |
Rate the effectiveness: Technical Support |
| Demographics |
Age, Sex, Enrollment Status, Employment Status, Educational Goal, |
| Student Appraisal of Online Instruction (1 page). |
Communication among faculty and students |
- Faculty member encouraged students to ask questions
- Threaded discussion on message boards with instructor and classmates.
|
| Prompt Feedback |
- Fac. Member gave adequate feedback
- Faculty responded to questions in timely manner
|
| Collab. among students |
- The faculty member facilitated interaction between student and the faculty member
- The faculty member facilitated interaction among students in the class.
- Threaded Discussion (on message boards) with instructor and classmates was academically beneficial
|
| Clearly defined objectives |
- The syllabus clearly presented the course objectives.
|
| Meet course objectives |
- The course content matched the course objectives
- Faculty member tests related to course objectives
|
| Technical aspect of the site |
Overall course delivery mode was satisfactory |
| General Comments |
Additional Comments |
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| Cochise |
Online Course Evaluation
- Course evaluation
(2 pages) |
Prompt feedback |
- The instructor has been prepared and responded to questions in a timely fashion.
- Adequate time has bee given to complete and return assignments.
|
| Clearly defined objectives |
Objectives were clearly stated to include course requirements, grading and assignments |
| Meet course objectives |
To date the objectives of the courses have been met. |
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| Kentucky Virtual University |
Survey of Online Students (Noel-Levitz)
Parts of Survey:
- Introductory questions.
- Choosing courses
- Evaluating your online experience
- Suggestions, advice, feedback
- Demographics
(11 pages) |
Communication among faculty & Students |
Communication with the instructor |
| Collaboration among students & faculty |
- Chat rooms, forums, or threaded discussions
- Communication with other students in the course
|
| Meets course objectives |
Course meets employers’ needs |
| Technical aspects of site |
- The ease of accessing the course website
- User friendliness of website
- Difficulties experienced in: Connecting to class website, sending/receiving email, joining live class discussions, dial up modem connection, linking to external sites from course websites.
|
| Technical support |
- Availability of technical support
- How helpful were: help from instructor with technical problems, tech help desk.
|
| Student Satisfaction |
Would you take more online courses? |
| General Comments |
- If you answered “not helpful”, explain
- List other resources you used for help
- Provide any suggestions, advice or feedback that will help to improve our students’ online course experience
|
| Demographics |
- Time available to spend online courses
- Financial resources
- Racial group
- Level of education
- Gender
- Age
- ZIP Code
- Enter drawing with name and address
|
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| Franklin |
Online Student Evaluation Course & Instructor
Parts of Survey:
- Demographics
- About the Course
- About the Faculty
- Comments
(7 pages) |
Communication among faculty & Students |
- The instructor encouraged student participation and interaction
- The instructor communicated with me as a partner in the learning process.
- The instructor was accessible by e-mail.
- The instructor was accessible during online hours
- The instructor was accessible through the class bulletin board.
- The instructor communicated the course concepts clearly.
- Effective use of technology—email, etc.
|
| Prompt Feedback |
- The instructor responded to my questions in a timely manner (within 48 hrs.)
- Constructive feedback to my questions
- Constructive feedback on graded assignments.
|
| Collaboration among students |
- The instructor encouraged student participation and interaction.
- Effective use of technology (email, class bulletin board, chat room, etc.)
|
| Student satisfaction |
Would you recommend this course to other students? |
| Assignment Deadlines |
The syllabus effectively communicated the expectations of the course. |
| High Faculty Expectations |
Grading criteria were clearly stated in the course materials. |
| Technical aspect of site |
Organization of Web site |
| Clearly defined objectives |
The syllabus effectively communicated the expectations of the course. |
| Demographics |
Major, Gender, Age |
| General Comments |
- Please comment on how course can be improved.
- About the Course If you rated any item (6-10) Blow or Notably below expectations, please explain why
- What did you like most about the course and why?
- What suggestions do you have to improve the course?
- What did you like most about this faculty member, and why?
- What suggestions do you have for this faculty member to improve?
|
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| Guilford Technical |
Online Course Peer Observation & Online Course Evaluation |
Communication among faculty & students |
Interacts with students through announcements, discussion board and/or virtual classroom. |
| Prompt feedback |
Instructor evaluates and returns assignments and/or exams with feedback in a timely manner
Students receive regular and timely feedback from instructor regarding their progress via email or online graded book. |
| Assign deadlines |
Course calendar alerts students to pending due dates/ |
| High faculty expectation |
Syllabus identifies instructors course grading policies and course objectives/requirements |
| Diverse Assignments |
Materials from a variety of sources are used to enhance instruction
Presentation of materials appeals to variety of learning style. |
| Clearly defined goals |
Syllabus clearly communicates course objectives, required course elements, and grading scale |
| General Comments |
This is available |
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| Phoenix |
- Registration Survey
- Communications Skills Inventory
- Faculty End-of-Semester Survey
- Student End-of Semester Survey
- Adult Learning Outcomes Assessment
- Professional and Educational Values Assessment
|
Demographics |
SS number, highest level of education you have attained, years of full employment, which parent attended college, dependent children, etc. |
| Curriculum meets course objectives |
Effectiveness of learning objectives, topics, activities, assignments |
| Course curriculum meets objectives |
Instructor’s presentation of the course material contributed to the course objectives |
| Tech. Support |
Received accurate and appropriate technical support while accessing the web site. |
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| St. Petersburg |
Student Survey of Online Instruction
Parts of Survey:
- The instructor
- Additional questions related to online course delivery
- Additional information in the form of comments
(2 pages) |
Communication faculty & Students |
- Communicates effectively via Internet
- Provides clear instruction for course assignments
- Responds to student concerns and questions.
- There were sufficient opportunities for interaction with the instructor and other students in the course
|
| Collab. among students |
Encourages student online interaction |
| High Faculty Expectation |
- Assigns work that is challenging
- Encourages students toward high standards of performance.
|
| Student Satisfaction |
- I felt as involved in this course as in a traditional classroom setting
- I would recommend this online course to other students.
- Based on my experience in this course, I would take another online course at SPC.
|
| Technical aspect of Site |
The technical challenges of this course were reasonable and manageable. |
| Clearly defined objectives |
Defined objectives for this course |
| Meets course objectives |
- Provides activities relevant to the objectives of the course.
- Gives assignments, exams and/or quizzes that apply to course content.
|
| General Comments |
Additional information related to your experience with this course |
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| CVCC |
Student Evaluation of Web Classes
Parts of survey:
- Demographic Information
- Student Support Services
- Student Satisfaction Survey
- Web course specific questions
- Comments
(11 pages) |
Communication among faculty & Services |
I was able to contact my instructor during the course. |
| Prompt Feedback |
My instructor returned graded materials in a timely manner. |
| Assignment Deadliness |
My instructor through established deadlines gave me enough time to finish assignments. |
| Student Satisfaction |
Entire section |
| Technical Support |
I had adequate technical support to help me use course materials and complete my assignments. |
| Technical aspect of Site |
- I had no problems accessing the website
- The website was well designed and easy to navigate.
- I had few problems adjusting to instruction in a virtual environment
- The instructor demonstrated technical and instructional expertise during the class.
|
| Clearly defined objectives |
- The course requirements were clearly stated
|
| Meet course objectives |
- The expected outcomes of the course, as established by the instructor, were met.
- This course met my learning expectations.
|
| Diverse Assignments |
My instructor demonstrated expertise in using a variety of learning activities |
| Demographics |
Gender, Age, Occupational status, Student status, Level of education, reason for enrolling, Veterans Benefits, Financial Aid, Curricular program, Number of years since last attending school. |
| General Comments |
Comments about What changes would make this course better? If you recommended this course to your friends, what would you tell them? Explain. Any other comments or suggestions. |
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| Lenoir |
End of Semester Survey for Internet-Based Courses
Parts of survey:
- Course
- Instructor
- Resources
- Technology
- Comments
(2 pages) |
Prompt feedback |
The instructor responded to my questions and submittal quickly and satisfactorily. |
| Technical support |
The technology necessary for the course worked properly.
The web pages for the course were of good quality, clear and at an appropriate intellectual level. |
| Comm. among faculty & students |
There was sufficient communication with the instructor. |
| Assignment deadlines |
The course schedule was reasonable. |
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| Sandhills Community College |
Student Evaluation: Internet and Distance Learning Services.
Parts of Survey:
- Instructor Evaluation
- Course Evaluation
- Library/LRC Services
- Student Services
(5 pages) |
Meets course objectives |
Instructor states the course objectives clearly. |
| High faculty expectation |
Instructor evaluates student work in accordance with the course objectives |
| Prompt feedback |
Evaluates student work in a timely manner.
Instructor responds to student questions via email, telephone or Blackboard in a timely manner. |
| Common. among faculty & students |
Instructor is available to consult with students through email or by telephone. |
| Technology |
Did the technology infrastructure (Blackboard) work properly? |
| Institutions |
Instrument Type |
Criteria |
Questions/Statements |
| Western Piedmont Community College |
Test Distance Learning Course Evaluation
(5 pages) |
Demographic— |
gender, age reason for taking distance ed course, enrollment status |
| Communication among faculty & students |
Communicate with instructor through use of email, fax, telephone mail or office visits.
Was instructor available when needed?
If you contacted your instructor by telephone, email or fax, did your instructor return your calls in a timely manner? |
| Technical Support |
Rate Video tape, Compact Disk, Web Page readability, clarity of assignments, and Web page user friendliness. |
